Skip to the content
What Obama Has Done Wrong Since the Terrorist Attack on Paris
-
If Obama knew there was a major ISIS terrorist camp in Raqqa Syria, why did he not order its destruction long ago instead of waiting to give France this intelligence information after the terror attack?
-
Despite FBI director James Comey’s admission that the Syrian refugees cannot be properly vetted, Obama double-downed on his insistence to import more Syrians despite the foreboding warning—even with the knowledge that at least 1 Paris ISIS terrorist snuck in as a Syria refugee
-
Obama refused to admit that his comments about ISIS being “contained” just a few hours prior to the Paris attack and after the Russian airliner bombing were unfounded and at best incorrect.
-
Obama arrived late to the moment of silence at the G-20 Conference
-
Obama failed to admit his strategy for containing ISIS has been faulty and needs to be completely revamped
-
Obama continues to fail to admit that there is any religious motivation behind ISIS’s actions
-
Obama continues to talk big in his efforts to fight ISIS but does little to combat the problemMy suggestion Mr. President is to actually lead when your country, if not the world, needs a leader. For once in your life take one step away from your left wing, progressive ideology and do what’s best for the citizens of this great country which elected you
Please Click on Picture to view Video of the real “plight” of the Syrian refugees.
Before welcoming the Syrian refuges with open arms, blindly accepting them all without a hint of a background check, the basic question remains as to who are these people? On the news, pictures of impoverished woman and children plaster the TV and web pages, making our heart ache at each new image. Though these pictures may be sobering, it hides the real truth about the nature of this invasion.
What most news outlet fail to inform is that 72 percent of these refugees are male—mostly in their 20’s or 30’s. The other 13 percent are woman while only 15 percent are children as reported by the United Human Rights Commission. These documented demographics are certainly not which is portrayed in the news. In fact, I only found one news agency on the web, Breitbart, which was reporting it. As the video above accurately displays, these refugees are mostly young men who don’t look impoverished, sick or even unkempt. In fact, many have cell phones and are indignant to any food or water mercifully given to them by the countries they invaded. After watching the video, I still am stunned how they throw food and water onto the rails as if they are insulted for such kind Western hospitality.
So TWO serious questions remain: Why are young, fighting men migrating West in such large numbers and Why is the mainstream media not reporting the truth? I certainly don’t have an answer to either of them, but these questions are certainly ones that need to be answered soon before the West ceases to exist. Does anyone really believe that these refugees plan to assimilate or acclimate to their new countries? The answer is a resounding no. For proof, just look at the major Western European cities most notably France. What will the West look like in 1, 5 or even 10 years down the road if the invasion continues?
Are these young fighting men terrorists? Are they here to fundamentally transform the West into a Muslim culture? Are they solely here just for cheap labor? Are there other more sinister reasons why leaders of state are so eager to welcome them? Who do they really have allegiance to? Why are no real background checks being conducted on these men? Why is the West not accepting the Christian refugees who are in the direst of needs?
The world is facing a massive crisis. History will look back at this time and say this is where it all went bad unless we do something now. Let the insanity stop before all of Western culture and our Judeo-Christian beliefs and principles are destroyed.
The “War on Terror” was coined by President Bush, denied by Obama and fought for by our brave soldiers. However, as the Middle East burns and the rise of increased radical Islam groups like ISIS take hold, it seems that we are slowly losing it.
Historians will look back and put the blame on many people and reasons for the loss. However, as our gains in the Middle East seemingly become squandered, one must ask, “What are we doing wrong?”
Many can blame poor strategy, a denial of the problem, a misunderstanding of Arab culture or a true lack of a president who is willing to fight for what is right. However, the fact remains, the more people we kill or capture over there, the more new terrorists are created. It’s a never ending loop. But how do we stop it?
The answer is really simple and few are willing to stand up say what is needed. The media and government are unwilling to acknowledge the solution and those that speak the truth are demonized.
The answer is simple. Just like in all the wars from ancient times until today, there is one main thing necessary to wage it—Money. Without money, there is no supplies, food, ammunition, or any other goods needed to pursue it. Where does the money the terrorist use to impose their radical Islam ways upon the world?
The answer is oil. Without oil, they would have nothing but sticks, sand and rocks to fight our soldiers. Without oil, they would not have the means to mount any offensive or counteroffensive. Without money, they would have no followers.
Cut off the oil and you cut off the head of our enemy.
Thus, the answer is emergency independence, and I’m not writing about all Obama’s green Solyndra failures. I’m writing about fracking, drilling, and mining for natural gas.
We have more than the means necessary to win this war. However, we still rely on foreign oil. And the proceeds from that oil are used to kill our soldiers and harass civilized society. It is insane that no one will properly address this problem and do what is needed to correct it. Instead, we send more and more of our brave men and woman into battle.
History repeats itself. Remember the only way we beat the Dessert Fox, Rommel, in tank warfare. We took away his oil. If we did the same to the Middle East victory would be assured.
Cut off the snake’s head and the body dies!
The major question in the news is if Obama’s unilateral action of negotiating with a terrorist organization is legal? Recently, the POW, Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl was freed after the Obama administration released five high-level Taliban members from the prison camp at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.
The release of these terrorist combatants completely diverges from our current policy as noted by Senator Ted Cruz. “The reason why the U.S. has had the policy for decades of not negotiating with terrorists is because once you start doing it, every other terrorist has an incentive to capture more soldiers.”
Some have stated that since we’ve previously brokered deals with countries that harbor terrorist such as Iran and North Korea, there has been no unilateral breech in American foreign policy. However, those making the argument have failed to realize that the Taliban is not a sovereign nation.
Susan E. Rice, the president’s national security adviser, argued, “Sergeant Bergdahl wasn’t simply a hostage; he was an American prisoner of war captured on the battlefield. We have a sacred obligation that we have upheld since the founding of our republic to do our utmost to bring back our men and women who are taken in battle, and we did that in this instance.”
Though Senator McCain welcomed the American soldier’s return, he called the five Taliban detainees, “the hardest of the hard core. It is disturbing that these individuals would have the ability to re-enter the fight, and they are big, high-level people, possibly responsible for the deaths of thousands” of Shiite Muslims in Afghanistan.
The question remains if this negotiation and trade were legal. Those that argue that Obama’s unilateral action was unjust simply point to the law. They note:
-
Congress requires official notice of any prisoner release from Guantánamo.
-
The secretary of defense is required to determine “the risk posed by the detainee” and certify that release or transfer “is in the national security interests of the United States,” according to U.S. law as written in the 2014 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).
-
Congressional committees must be notified by the administration at least 30 days before the release of any Gitmo inmate
-
The secretary of defense “must provide detailed information regarding the circumstances of the transfer or release along with the notification, including how the risk posed by the detainee will be substantially mitigated, the security arrangements in the receiving country, and an assessment of the capacity, willingness, and past practices of the receiving country”
Plus, the most important point made by Obama’s detractors was that the five terrorists will definitely jeopardize American safety and cause more death as a result of their release.
Some have argued that since we’ve previously brokered deals with countries that harbor terrorists such as Iran and Pakistan, there has been no unilateral breech in American foreign policy. However, those making the argument have failed to realize that the Taliban is not a sovereign nation.
When will the lawlessness of the Obama administration end? Have we entered a new era of tyranny? He is not above the law. Hold Obama accountable.
